Democrats Fail [in the Nano of Things]

Democrats Fail [in the Nano of Things]

I have noticed how over, say, the past twenty years of election cycles that Democrats come down with a bad case of nano-trouble on election night. Have you also noticed this phenomenon? Suddenly Democrats forget how to count votes but it only happens on election night, even when given extremely fast computer processors used to tally and calculate results. Why is that? Let’s approach it like a parent dealing with a troubled teenager. These Democrats seem to get into trouble quite a lot these days and so this particular subject might be worth spending more than a billion nanos on, [or approximately one second], especially since there’s a very important election coming up on Tuesday, November 8th.

This is exactly what should be bothering those of us who never voted for an idiot to occupy any office across the country. In other words, those of us who never ever [even once] voted Democrat. That describes me, I’ve never voted for a Democrat, not while I was conscious anyway. I’m so proud of that record these days! But many of you do and that’s why I have to write a kindergarten-level post like this, just for you! 🙂 It must be excruciating to not have an understanding of which candidate can be the best shepherd of the country; a condition that has never, ever described a Democrat candidate for office. Not ever!

What’s really bizarre about American elections in the post-Obama years is that now important elections are not settled on “election night”. We have to go to bed not knowing who won; when we wake the next morning, we still don’t know who won but off to our jobs we must go – very frustrating! Have you noticed this also? So bizarre! Recall how Stacy Abrams, “Stacy-zilla” is what I call her, refused to comprehend that she actually lost the Georgia Governor’s race in 2016? She pretended to be Georgia’s Governor for years afterward – hilarious! How about Hillary pumping out books explaining why she lost? They never had anything at all to do with why she lost. Plus none of them were ever read and reduced to ashes no doubt since.

So I was thinking that this would be a good time to consider how fast or slow computer processors [using even your basic laptop] calculates and spits out results. After all it is year 2022. Turns out these days [really since the early 1990’s] computer processors are so small as to be almost undetectable while simultaneously their processing speeds seem to have exploded into the stratosphere. Get this, a single gigahertz, [GHz] measure represents 1 billion cycles per second and many chips today are functioning at 3.5 – 4 GHz, so they’re processing data at speeds of 3.5 to 4 billion bits per second! [Note: 1 GHz = 1 billionth of a second or a single nanosecond. A nanosecond written in computation form represents, 1-9, or .000000001]. And in my most humble of opinions I’d say that’s more than adequate for government work!

Now considering that there’s only 86,400 seconds in a single day [if you’re where I am, on planet earth], and only 18,000 seconds can pass by in a span of 5 hours. So on any given election night I’d have to say that there’s plenty of bandwidth for even the most basic of computer processors to spit out results the same night where any American election is held. Especially given a U.S. population of what, only 330 million people? However, where Democrats are concerned [rotten to the core as they are], important elections can’t be measured in real time these days and settled for the winning candidate on the night of, just watch. But again why not? It looks like to me that voters will need to be replacing incompetence with competence once again. 😉

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments